On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:42:40 +0100 Simon <li...@thehobsons.co.uk> articulated:
{snip}
> Applying the logic used with some venom here, every one of those
> systems should have been upgraded and/or scrapped - never mind
> whether they would still be capable of doing the job they are there
> for.
This whole discussion is like the thread from hell. I block one and
another pops up. I am just going to have to start kill filtering
individual posters in order to eradicate it.
In any case, you statement displays the fallacy in your actions.
<quote>
never mind whether they would still be capable of doing the job they
are there for.
</quote>
NEWS FLASH: THEY ARE NOT CAPABLE OF DOING THE JOB THEY ARE THERE FOR!
That should be self evident.
By the way, I still also have an old 8086 with DOS 3? (I don't remember
the version) that still works. I still use it on occasion to copy old
5.25 floppys to other media. Yes, some local government agencies have
valuable documents archived in that format. However, I would never
expect it run Win7, nor do I bitch to Microsoft about it either.
--
Jerry
clamav.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
The state law of Pennsylvania prohibits singing in the bathtub.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
