"Gary R. Schmidt" <grschm...@acm.org> schrieb am 16.04.18 um 00:48:10 Uhr:
> >> Hmm, I just built it on an OpenSUSE system (I mainly use Solaris), and > >> had the same problem. Which is interesting as /etc/ld.so.conf contains > >> /usr/local/lib64, so it should find libclammspack.so.0 there. > > and youd did call "ldconfig"? > No, the OpenSUSE system is basically as it came out of the box, and > given that /etc/ld.so.conf contains /usr/local/lib64 by default I am > surprised that ldconfig would be needed. It contains both paths. > > ldconfig creates the necessary links and cache to the most > > recent shared libraries found in the directories specified on the > > command line, in the file /etc/ld.so.conf, and in the trusted > > directories, /lib and /usr/lib (on some 64-bit architectures such as > > x86-64, lib and /usr/lib are the trusted directories for 32-bit > > libraries, while /lib64 and /usr/lib64 are used for 64-bit libraries). > > > Does this mean that it is no longer possible to produce and install > binaries on Linux systems with having to create spec files and generate > installation packages for them? Any chance to get the thing working again? I fear going back to 0.94 is not the best idea. Kind regards Andreas -- PGP-Fingerprint: D392 5D21 0299 63D7 5BAE 4562 1E56 B2EA 81A2 59F1
pgpL1UpJKzsZK.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
