On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Reio Remma via clamav-users wrote:
I guess many of us are just running too old hardware. :)
Here's a comparison between my mail server and identical config
running in a VM.
Sep 6 09:41:06 mail clamd[31441]: Reading databases from
/var/lib/clamav
Sep 6 09:44:05 mail clamd[31441]: Database correctly reloaded
(10741767 ...
Sep 6 09:56:43 vm clamd[2108]: Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Sep 6 09:57:17 vm clamd[2108]: Database correctly reloaded (10742128 ...
Fri Sep 6 08:49:08 2019 -> Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Fri Sep 6 08:50:18 2019 -> Database correctly reloaded (8830356 signatures)
Fri Sep 6 09:48:25 2019 -> Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Fri Sep 6 09:49:49 2019 -> Database correctly reloaded (8830677 signatures)
Fri Sep 6 10:47:36 2019 -> Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Fri Sep 6 10:48:53 2019 -> Database correctly reloaded (8830954 signatures)
average ~1:20 on X3440 CPU (10 years old).
On 06/09/2019 11:31, G.W. Haywood wrote:
That's very useful, thanks. Can you compare the costs of running
them for us?
On 06.09.19 11:54, Reio Remma via clamav-users wrote:
I suspect the i9-9900 is cheaper to actually run than the old
whichever Core is in the mail server. :D
I think that virtual/cloud server has to be cheaper than power usage of the
existing server (plus housing, if you pay for that one).
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux - It's now safe to turn on your computer.
Linux - Teraz mozete pocitac bez obav zapnut.
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
