>>On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Reio Remma via clamav-users wrote:
>>>I guess many of us are just running too old hardware. :)
>>>
>>>Here's a comparison between my mail server and identical config
>>>running in a VM.
>>>
>>>Sep 6 09:41:06 mail clamd[31441]: Reading databases from
>>>/var/lib/clamav
>>>Sep 6 09:44:05 mail clamd[31441]: Database correctly reloaded
>>>(10741767 ...
>>>
>>>Sep 6 09:56:43 vm clamd[2108]: Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
>>>Sep 6 09:57:17 vm clamd[2108]: Database correctly reloaded (10742128 ...
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Fri Sep 6 08:49:08 2019 -> Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Fri Sep 6 08:50:18 2019 -> Database correctly reloaded (8830356 signatures)
Fri Sep 6 09:48:25 2019 -> Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Fri Sep 6 09:49:49 2019 -> Database correctly reloaded (8830677 signatures)
Fri Sep 6 10:47:36 2019 -> Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Fri Sep 6 10:48:53 2019 -> Database correctly reloaded (8830954 signatures)
average ~1:20 on X3440 CPU (10 years old).
On 07.09.19 21:03, Robert M. Stockmann via clamav-users wrote:
I notice that the above clamd configuration is reloading the clamav
databases every hour, but thats not how its supposed to work. My
configuration only attempts a reload when actually new .cvd updates are
received :
If you read the logs carefully, you'd notice that there's different number
of signatures, thus, the database did change.
That's not the poing.
>On 06/09/2019 11:31, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>>That's very useful, thanks. Can you compare the costs of running
>>them for us?
On 06.09.19 11:54, Reio Remma via clamav-users wrote:
>I suspect the i9-9900 is cheaper to actually run than the old
>whichever Core is in the mail server. :D
I think that virtual/cloud server has to be cheaper than power usage of the
existing server (plus housing, if you pay for that one).
Why everyone needs two minutes for this task, independent from which
hardware is used, is a puzzle to me. Anyone who has the clamd .cvd
files loaded on a fast SSD storage ?
I think it needs fast CPU, that's why it takes time.
all the signatures have to be parsed and indexed in memory and that's huge
number of signatures.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
WinError #98652: Operation completed successfully.
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
