On 3/29/20 10:10 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I disagree, setting up clamav-milter is much easier than settingup amavis.
On 29.03.20 10:26, PGNet Dev via clamav-users wrote:
you're not alone
I use clamav-milter
same here
and spamass-milter on my machine. So, I have both spam
and virus scanning. Didn't have big need to replace them by amavis here.
i'm looking to remove amavis from my mix
at the moment i use it only for 2 passes of SA ... one pre-queue, one
post-queue.
curious as to the basis for your spamass-milter choice, vs other SA-only
invervetions such as spampd, etc. ?
milter runs as pre-queue, so I can reject spam without caring about bounces
or dropping mail.
This can be a downside if your customers expect quick response from mail
server and complain.
The latter is case for post-queue solutions.
i've just started looking at the lot of 'em. some seem pretty
dusty/unmaintained -- i just dunno yet whether that matters at all, or if
they're just simple/stable enough.
would be useful to hear your experience ...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
