On Wed, 7 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just FYI: this is the first time I remember seeing openSUSE
> > > > notifying something about ClamAV.
> > >
> > > Looks like this is OpenSUSE's response to the recent announcement
of
> > > ...
> > > https://blog.clamav.net/2021/06/clamav-eol-of-0100x-versions.html
> > > ...
> > > No wonder Joel's been tearing his hair out.
> >
> > Is there a concern for those running ClamAV 0.103.2?
>
> You mean apart from those listed in the announcements?
>
> https://marc.info/?l=clamav-users&m=162429486707369&w=2
>
> --
>
> 73,
> Ged.
I found that link to be virtually unreadable from [attachment #5)] and
below.
I think attachment #5 is just an html version of the part above.
I have no idea why Ged pointed you at the marc.info archive rather than
https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2021-June/011372.html
which is the same message on the official clamav archive (which I find
easier to read), or the blog post
https://blog.clamav.net/2021/06/clamav-01033-patch-release.html
which Joel's email was repeating.
All three have rather longer lines than are convenient on a small screen.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
