Sven> Maybe it should be shortened to just Sven> GtkImage_* instead. (Including the class name seems like a good idea to Sven> me, since it indicates what kind of class obj is intended to be, and Sven> where the function is located.)
For non-static C functions we should either use the JNI convention or pick some other classpath-specific prefix. "GtkImage" sounds to me like something that would reasonably be reserved as a prefix by the gtk implementors... Ideally we would have a script to check namespace cleanliness for our native code. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
