On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:30 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > It was removed by this patch: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2005-11/msg00065.html > For which you said it worked for you: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2005-11/msg00066.html
That was my fault, as i only tested on x86_64-linux, it seems. But the actual problem is with the darwin linker. TWISTI
