Hi Christian, On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:42 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:30 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > It was removed by this patch: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2005-11/msg00065.html > > For which you said it worked for you: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2005-11/msg00066.html > > That was my fault, as i only tested on x86_64-linux, it seems. But the > actual problem is with the darwin linker.
So it seems we need to revert the patch in the first message. Could you prepare such a patch and test it on those two systems? Thanks, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
