Hi, On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 00:50 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > As to your contribution, the Classpath part (i.e. the java.lang.Class > changes, Mauve has different contribution rules) looks minor enough to > not require an assignment, but I'll let Mark (CCed) answer that for > definite. However, if you intend to do further Classpath > contributions, I'd suggest sorting out the necessary paperwork with > the FSF; you need to assign copyright to them. Either Mark or I > should be able to send you the form.
Yes, you are right. This is small enough to be "obvious", but it would be nice to have paperwork on file with the FSF stating your willingness to contribute (larger) patches in the future. I'll send you the request form. BTW. libgcj has a slightly different implementation of Class.getSimpleName() that might be worth merging with the classpath version: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q3/msg00192.html Cheers, Mark
