Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andrew> Yes, but gcj's implementation was also broken. This is the > Andrew> current gcj code; please let me know if you think it's still > Andrew> wrong. > > I think looking for a "$" in general is wrong. I think instead the > name should be looked up in the InnerClasses attribute. AFAIK that's > the only guaranteed-reliable way to do this.
I don't understand where you think the problem lies. As far as I can see the form of a name is guaranteed, and therefore using '$' is OK. "Class.getName(): "If this class object represents a reference type that is not an array type then the binary name of the class is returned" # The binary name of a top-level type is its canonical name (§6.7). # The binary name of a member type consists of the binary name of its immediately enclosing type, followed by $, followed by the simple name of the member. # The binary name of a local class (§14.3) consists of the binary name of its immediately enclosing type, followed by $, followed by a non-empty sequence of digits, followed by the simple name of the local class. # The binary name of an anonymous class (§15.9.5) consists of the binary name of its immediately enclosing type, followed by $, followed by a non-empty sequence of digits. Andrew.
