Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:44:29 +0100 Andrew John Hughes <ahug...@redhat.com>:
> On 11:38 Tue 22 Jun , Ivan Maidanski wrote: > > > > ... > > > > I've committed this. I don't know how you managed to build it as > > > > tools/Makefile.am was not being updated > > > > with the new message bundle filenames. I fixed this before commit. > > > > > > Thanks. I've compiled the java sources with ant. (I've also forgot to > > > update Makefile.am in another pending patch - > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12983/) > > > > Sorry, I see the solved problem now: .properties files are listed in > > tools/Makefile.am at present (but I wrote this patch originally for > > Classpath v0.93 which had no such list in Makefile.am); and since only the > > filenames' case is modified, the change isn't noticeable on my Win32 > > development host. > > > > How are you building the native code? How are you actually using GNU > Classpath? The only native code I'm using is jcl.c, gtkpeer and jawt. At present, I'm using Classpath v0.93 (which is the last one conforming to JLS v2). I'm building the native code with "./configure ; make" on a Linux box but I just run javac directly to build/test the classes I've modified (I'm on a Win32 host). > > > In the above mentioned patch (.../12983/), I've added a new file > > (UnicodeBig.java) but AICS there is no need to add a reference to it from > > any script file. > > The build system finds the java files on its own as long as they're in the > appropriate part of the tree. > > > > > > ... > -- > Andrew :) > > Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
