> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>
> "Aaron M. Renn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Brian Jones wrote:
> > > I'm having problems with 'make dist' and 'make distdir'.  Here is the
> > > error message.
> >
> > I don't know why you can't successfully run japharh.  It could
> be because
> > the java.net package isn't built however.  I've got all sorts of build
> > dependency problems that keep my compiles from working right now.
>
> Okay, I guess no one picked it up from my message that I was asking
> whether or not that sequence of commands really should run during the
> making of a distribution.  In other words when you run `make dist', no
> java classes are currently compiled and hence the japharh would fail.
>
> Looks like we need to make sure the classes get compiled first in
> building the distribution if that is how you want to do it.  I don't
> know if the stub files are platform dependent on UNIX or not, does
> anyone?
>

If we must choose, I think the distribution should include .class and .h
files.  In which case it has to go through and compile all the classes.

It would be especially nice to have two separate distributions: the Class
distribution, and the Native distribution.  Seems cleaner that way.  Then,
if all they are interested in is getting the thing running on their specific
platform, they can download classpath.jar with just classfiles and download
the native source separately to compile on their machine.

--John Keiser

Reply via email to