"John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is there anything that makes that unusable in our AWT implementation? Maybe
> it'd be best, instead of using native calls, to just do a pure Java AWT that
> talks to the GTK stuff to create windows and such.
> Just a thought, I'm no AWT expert.
That's certainly possible -- there are some lightweight AWT peer
implementations out there...
Chris
> --John Keiser
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Fisher
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 4:35 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: more news on gtk + java
> >
> >
> > Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Anyway, the point being there is part of the job which is getting
> > > the AWT peers in GTK+ and someone pointed out the classpath effort
> > > and Chris Toshok's involvement here. If you need some help Chris or
> > > want to coordinate with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Your message seems to imply that Oliver Gutknecht is doing AWT peers.
> > He's not. He's doing a 1 to 1 mapping from GTK+ to Java. While it's
> > certainly a good thing to do, this hardly applies to mapping GTK+ to
> > the AWT.
> >
> > --
> > Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
