"Maxim Kizub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think can't catch John's idea... Can you write me a three-line example?
>
> Also, I do not think javac/guavac/etc needs analogs of require/ensure
> You'll have checks in debug code, if compile with kiev, and you
> do not have them if compile with others... I see no problems...
>
It sounds like the Kiev extensions will do nothing for us unless we
want to build a special "debug" version of the library. I think
that this is what Maxim keeps saying and that this isn't a 'check for
null' replacement.
Brian
--
|-------------------------------|Software Engineer
|Brian Jones |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |http://www.nortel.net
|http://www.classpath.org/ |------------------------------
