"John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The only plausible solution, then, that ports to javac is the use of
> some sort of no-kiev comment style.

Why bother with require/ensure equivalents for javac?  If you use Kiev
you win, if you use javac you lose.  I don't see a big problem with
that.

I also don't particular like this whole "comment this and Kiev will
understand it" and "comment this and Kiev will ignore it".  It makes
code ugly.

Why not just use require/ensure in the normal Kiev manner and use sed
to augment the source if Classpath is being compiled with a normal
java compiler?

-- 
Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to