"John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only plausible solution, then, that ports to javac is the use of > some sort of no-kiev comment style. Why bother with require/ensure equivalents for javac? If you use Kiev you win, if you use javac you lose. I don't see a big problem with that. I also don't particular like this whole "comment this and Kiev will understand it" and "comment this and Kiev will ignore it". It makes code ugly. Why not just use require/ensure in the normal Kiev manner and use sed to augment the source if Classpath is being compiled with a normal java compiler? -- Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: gnu vs. org.gnu: a possible useful dis... John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Brian Jones
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev Paul Fisher
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Artur Biesiadowski
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Paul Fisher
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Brian Jones
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Brian Jones
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub

