Maksim Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I'm not sure that providing a plug-in replacement is a particularly
> good idea (though I wouldn't complain if someone did it) since it would
> take huge resources and swing isn't particaulrly brillant anyway (nice
> yes - great no). Having a "light" replacement such as the dogui tk would
> probably be just as good an alternative, with people developing other
> widgets as needed - thouhg a decent architecture would be needed, swing
> has very flexible architecture and perhaps suffers a bit for it.
javax.swing is part of the core library set as of 1.2, or Java 2,
however you'd like to say it. The end result is we have to implement
it and we will.
Brian
