> > I thought that the whole point of the "javax" prefix was to denote things
> > that weren't standardized as part of the core library set -- java eXtensions.
> I thought so as well. Servlets were part of the standard Java package while
> still having a javax prefix, but were later removed. Confusion on Sun's part?
All will be clear ...
http://www.javasoft.com/products/jfc/package.html
I think this means that because it's "javax." it will be downloadable
by applets running in web browsers, whereas if it were just "java." it
would not be (due to security concerns).
Chris Dailey
