Re: libgcj -- another LGPL implementation?

[Anthony Green]

Artur wrote:
> Gcj does the opposite - everywhere where it is feasible they go for
> C++ code.

This isn't quite true.  The vast majority of code is in Java.  We go
to C++ code when:

     a) we have to because there's no other way - just like any other
        implementation
     b) it's a clear performance win (character conversion code maybe?)

AG

-- 
Anthony Green                                               Cygnus Solutions
                                                       Sunnyvale, California