"Aaron M. Renn" wrote: > > It occurs to me that I did not post anything about this to the list. > Sorry. > > As you may know, we plan to enhance Matt Welsh's NinjaRMI package to > make it 100% compatible with the standard Java class library version > and adopt it for Classpath. Due to licensing constraints, we cannot > include it directly in our project. NinjaRMI will remain a separate > project. However, we can distribute a snapshot if as our RMI > implementation. (This is similar to how we rely on GTK+ for our > native AWT implementation). > > Since Kaffe needs RMI as well, I proposed that we work together to > bring this package to a usage state. They agreed. Matt is super busy > right now so not much is happening, but we might try to set up a > CVS repository soon and start work ourselves. > > If anyone is interested in contributing to this effort, please > respond to this message. > > -- > Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/ I would be interested in helping out in this regard. I finished my last final here this morning, and I should be able to work some on it soon. I'm relatively untainted by JDK source (I've looked at a couple of classes in java.awt and java.util from the sources bundled with the JDK 1.0.2). Brian Bassett
