Doug South wrote:
> Not a whole lot. Though I'm afraid I've been sidetracked recently, but I
> think this is a good sidetrack. Just to see if I could cope with working
> again, I started working on a swing implementation of the awt. Sounds
> easy, but I've run into a major snag. I won't bore 98% of this list with
> the gory details, but I've got a chicken and egg problem. I'm hoping
> that if I can overcome this problem, the swing implementation will give
> me further insight into how java.awt.Toolkit and co. work, thus doing a
> better job of GAWT.
Good to hear from you again. Glad to hear you are feeling better. A couple
of points on Swing (which may be wrong since I don't know it that well). I
believe that Swing is by the spec supposed to be made up of 100% pure Java
lightweight components. Which means that Swing basically has to depend on
awt. It's something to look at. Probably we will need a working awt before
Swing.
--
*****************************************************
* Aaron M. Renn *
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Homepage: <URL:http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/> *
*****************************************************
