>>>>> "Artur" == Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Artur> A number of libgcj classes are heavily instrumented with CNI Artur> native methods (for sake of speed/space etc - most notably Artur> String and Character classes). Will gcj switch to classpath Artur> ones, or there would be differences in implementations for some Artur> classes ? (not talking about obvious ones required by porting, Artur> like Class or WeakReference) I'm unwilling to give up the speed advantages offered by our use of CNI (which is nowhere near as prevalent as people here seem to think). However, I think these decisions must really be made on a class-by-class basis, and we don't have enough information yet to make them. So the answer is, "it depends". Tom
- Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Paul Fisher
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Mark Benvenuto
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Artur Biesiadowski
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Brian Jones
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke