>>>>> "Bradley" == Bradley M Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bradley> (BTW, is there a mailing lists for libgcj, and will it be Bradley> merged with the Classpath mailing list now?) There are a few libgcj-related mailing lists. See http://sourceware.cygnus.com/java for a full list. I'm ambivalent about merging the lists. There are two issues, as I see it: 1. How will people here react to a lot of questions about gcj, building libgcj, etc, etc. (See the java-discuss archives for an idea of the volume). 2. Do we lose any features, eg archiving (I've heard that the classpath mailing list archiver is sometimes flaky? Is this true? Or maybe I have my wires crossed). There are many other technical details to be worked out in terms of merging the projects. I haven't really given it much thought, though I could come up with a list if somebody wants one. T
- Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Paul Fisher
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Mark Benvenuto
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Artur Biesiadowski
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Brian Jones
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke