Bryce> I actually like the libgcj style better, its more
Bryce> concise.
Bryce> Is there a legal requirement to have the verbose header, or
Bryce> could we settle on a new, more concise header like the libgcj
Bryce> one?
I don't know if there is a legal requirement or not.
It is just generally done as part of the GNU coding style.
For Classpath it is misleading if the header says something about
libgcj. Also there is some value in consistency (we can write a
script to make edits if need be -- I've done this before).
Tom
