Warren Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hmm, it looks to me like libgcj is using the same code for lookup as
> classpath is (and has used for quite a while).  Is this a change you think
> applies to classpath also or did you think it was libgcj-specific?

It applies to both.  I don't see a reason for the two implementations
in libgcj/classpath to diverge.  We should probably lean towards the
libgcj implementation... I especially like to remove our use of native
methods unless they are really ncessary.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to