Anthony Green submitted a gcj patch that fixes a Security bug. It
also changes Security.loadProviders to look for `gcj.security' and not
`classpath.security':
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2001-q3/msg00460.html
One problem with this is that it introduces a divergence between
Classpath and libgcj. I prefer to avoid those.
What if we change this mechanism so that we can have a VM-dependent
`.security' file in addition to the `classpath.security' file? The
idea would be to use the `java.vm.name' property to look up the
initial security file, and then fall back on classpath.security.
Comments?
Tom
PS I'm going to check in his bug fix shortly.
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
