Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anthony Green submitted a gcj patch that fixes a Security bug. It > also changes Security.loadProviders to look for `gcj.security' and not > `classpath.security': > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2001-q3/msg00460.html > > One problem with this is that it introduces a divergence between > Classpath and libgcj. I prefer to avoid those.
I apologize for not having read that link yet, but how does changing the name to gcj.security have to do with fixing a bug? Is this really gcj specific? Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
