Andreas Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Some good ideas here, but let's not exclude other JVMs such as SableVM > > or kissme. A side question of mine at the moment is whether any of > > these support working with the AWT and native peer code other than > > GCJ. > > Don't you think it would be better to focus on one JVM (at least from the > Classpath side) and get the AWT running there?
Yes for development, but I thought we were talking about documentation? In the near future we should have support for IBM's JRVM in CVS (and in a release soon after) and at some point Kaffe may work with Classpath as well although that depends on people interested in Kaffe. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
