Phillip Morelock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > I know I'm still new to this community, but since I'm going to focus my > efforts on documentation because I have been ruled "unclean" ;) ... > > Resultant newbie question: is it still "ok" to use sun's javadoc tool or is > there an appropriate free tool? How do "they" (or you) generally feel about > using non-free tools in this context? also, what is the state of > such tool?
The classpath-tools project has a javadoc tool underway. AFAIK it is working at a basic level but isn't bug checked and stuff yet. It's fine, for now, to use Sun's javadoc tool. When the classpath-tools javadoc is working we can switch to that. Note that the classpath-tools javadoc program supports outputing the javadoc in texinfo instead of html. Texinfo is the GNU documentation format (it's what "info" files are written in). > Forgive me, I'm still pretty new to the whole "GNU" mindset and > don't want to step on toes or whatever. Nobody who wants to help will ever step on any ones toes /8-> If you're confused or lost just ask and we'll help. Nic _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
