>>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron M Renn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Aaron> o Solidify the JVM interface. If we are going to fundamentally Aaron> rethink it, the sooner the better. I think this is important for a 1.0 release. It seems like we're all agreed on this. Aaron> o Figure out the JNI/CNI situation and merge the native Aaron> backends with gcj. I don't think we should let this hold up Classpath 1.0. libgcj will probably continue to have some divergences with Classpath for quite some time. The CNI thing is just part of it. In other places we have divergences for performance reasons (see ResourceBundle) or due to how our VM is implemented (see Reference). Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
