--- Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Mar 2003, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > Maybe we should just take the TeX approach and > just converge to some > > non-rational number like e, so we can say that we > are now at version > > 2.7182 :) > > Hm, I think e is already taken by LaTeX. What else > is there? (Apart from i > :>).
Are complex numbers allowed? cheers, dalibor topic __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
