-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Saturday 29 March 2003 18:27, Brian Jones wrote: > Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Brian> There are still some getInstance problems with some of the > > Brian> things I recently checked in though a check through my Mauve > > Brian> results appears to indicate nothing terribly new here. > > > > Are these getInstance problems revealed by Mauve? > > Or did you find them some other way? > > I'd like to put all this java.security stuff into libgcj, but I'd > > also prefer to wait if there is a regression that will be ironed > > out soon... > > I looked at the Mauve results before and after and essentially the > same getInstance problems and I don't know much about it other than > that. It could just be because I don't have gnu-crypto configured > with the mauve testing. Need to investigate.
the Mauve tests for the getInstance() methods (at least those i added recently) do not rely/depend on GNU Crypto. all the testcases, install their own, temporary, providers. to test the patch i submitted earlier, i used my local copy of gcc, to which i applied the same patch. all the security related Mauve tests passed. cheers; rsn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Que du magnifique iD8DBQE+hZBE+e1AKnsTRiERA4D8AKDMx3nwhNHKZcw9v8VHaTtLFky7KgCgifot weqI0s9rNYgv/3fwpYsgzdk= =JVat -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
