-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Brian Jones wrote: | "Raif S. Naffah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | |>On Saturday 29 March 2003 18:27, Brian Jones wrote: |> |>>Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |>> |>>>>>>>>"Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |>>> |>>>Brian> There are still some getInstance problems with some of the |>>>Brian> things I recently checked in though a check through my Mauve |>>>Brian> results appears to indicate nothing terribly new here. |>>> |>>>Are these getInstance problems revealed by Mauve? |>>>Or did you find them some other way? |>>>I'd like to put all this java.security stuff into libgcj, but I'd |>>>also prefer to wait if there is a regression that will be ironed |>>>out soon... |>> |>>I looked at the Mauve results before and after and essentially the |>>same getInstance problems and I don't know much about it other than |>>that. It could just be because I don't have gnu-crypto configured |>>with the mauve testing. Need to investigate. |> |>the Mauve tests for the getInstance() methods (at least those i added |>recently) do not rely/depend on GNU Crypto. all the testcases, install |>their own, temporary, providers. |> |>to test the patch i submitted earlier, i used my local copy of gcc, to |>which i applied the same patch. all the security related Mauve tests |>passed. | | It's broken under Kissme/Classpath. |
Just to throw my hat into the ring...
Most of the security tests succeed for me with SableVM, except for a few cases where the tests themselves cannot locate the constructor for inner classes.
- -- Casey Marshall || [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+hh2/gAuWMgRGsWsRAlPmAKCNmqGEDKg/GkXYROub9lvCiUm/AQCeJimJ 66R3xR+eDWBdbnF86tKplVk= =Cpjh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
