>>>>> "Sascha" == Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sascha> I know about the implicit modifiers for interface fields, but Sascha> I am a bit surprised that omitting them would be our coding Sascha> standard. Is it a good idea to omit declarations that, while Sascha> technically redundant, make the code easier to understand? First, I didn't make this particular rule. As I recall in libgcj we did have all the redundant modifiers. However, I think the rationale here is that even Sun suggests not using these. Well, ok, I could only find this style discouragement for modifiers on methods. See JLS 9.4. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
