Hi, On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 04:00, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> We had this discussion on irc lately because I got a report > Michael> about this from a user. Tromey said the best solution would > Michael> be to pass -std=c99 (or similar) to gcc instead of changing > Michael> the source code. Its a discussion C89 vs. C99. > > Actually I think I'd prefer we change the source and use -std=c89. > I'm assuming C89 is what Classpath native code is supposed to be > written in.
I don't believe it is really designed for a particular C-dialect. But it would be nice if it is compilable with gcc-2.95. It seems gcc-2.95 supports -std=c9x so we can switch to that. But I cannot figure out how to convince Autoconf that I want that dialect used for my C files. Clues anybody? Thanks, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
