Am Freitag, 26. M�rz 2004 11:09 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 04:00, Tom Tromey wrote: > > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Michael> We had this discussion on irc lately because I got a > > report Michael> about this from a user. Tromey said the best > > solution would Michael> be to pass -std=c99 (or similar) to gcc > > instead of changing Michael> the source code. Its a discussion C89 > > vs. C99. > > > > Actually I think I'd prefer we change the source and use -std=c89. > > I'm assuming C89 is what Classpath native code is supposed to be > > written in. > > I don't believe it is really designed for a particular C-dialect. But > it would be nice if it is compilable with gcc-2.95. It seems gcc-2.95 > supports -std=c9x so we can switch to that. But I cannot figure out > how to convince Autoconf that I want that dialect used for my C > files. Clues anybody?
Added AM_CFLAGS=-std=c89 in the Makefile.am is one option but it would mean we need to add it to all Makefile.am in all dirs with native code. CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -std=c89 AC_SUBST(CFLAGS) This in configure.ac is another option. The only problem I see is that we probably support non-gcc compilers that dont support this flag. What will they do when they see it ? Michael _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
