Michael Koch writes: > Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 10:27 schrieb Andrew Haley: > > > > Well, that's the question: do we make Classpath harder to debug / > > read in order to optimize the performance of some unfree C > > compilers? > > It's not bad to support other compilers too but this should should not > be used to make the code unreadable and hard to understand. If its > hard to achieve better drop support for some compilers.
We weren't talking about dropping any support: merely a performance decrease for some old unfree compilers. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
