Andrew John Hughes wrote: > ... Also, on reading the new specs. for this stuff, something > seems to apply that this run-time dropping may only be temporary (i.e. > that the idea is to ween people off non-generic code). But I'd be > really interested to hear the opinion of others on this.
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/06/12/Comparable -- Chris Burdess
pgpwFYcF7BMFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
