Hi all, A few thing recently have brought my attention to an issue I believe still exists with the generics branch; namely, what is the status regards the additions of 1.5 features? I had assumed the following:
* Features requiring language features, such as generics, enums, etc. go on the generics branch. * Anything else goes on HEAD. Yet there is still a body of code on the generics branch that goes in the latter category (the valueOf() functions in the primitive classes for instance). Should this be merged across? And what is the general view on adding modified versions of some classes (e.g. Enum), as has been proposed, so as to give temporary, primarily run-time support? Also, re. Jeroen's e-mail, I'd be interested to hear from any VM implementers who are looking at the generics branch and what support they need within the class library as regards integrating new features such as 1.5 reflection support. Thanks, -- Andrew :-) Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com "Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." -- Richard Stallman Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
