> I saw Roman already said these changes look OK. And as you suggested on
> classpath-patches with respect to the LightweightPeer changes that
> Lillian proposed it would be good if Lillian incorporated these changes
> in her patch.
Thanks. That would be great.
> > + public void repaint(long tm, int x, int y, int width, int height)
> > + {
> > + Component p = comp.getParent ();
> > + if(p != null)
> > + p.repaint(0,x+comp.getX(),y+comp.getY(),width,height);
> > + }
>
> Why do you discard the tm argument when passing repaint to the parent?
Oops -- good spotting. I've posted an update on the patches list.
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
