On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 08:03 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Mark Wielaard wrote: > > A release branch has been created 'classpath-0_95-branch' > > Shouldn't that have been 0.94?
Yeah, the branch was created, then I realized my mistake. But the revisionist history is that 0.95 is such a huge step forward (and so late) that it deserves a 0.02 version bumb. And it ends in a 5 which shows our commitment to 1.5+ from here on. :) > > I'll try to pick up any fixes made on the trunk, but if you feel some > > patch is release critical please do CC me. > > I'd really like to see the removal of the META-INF/services/*xml* go in. Yes, that seems like a good idea. libgcj also did I believe that and the fallbacks are in place. Besides the four service files you mention they also remove the following 2 though: META-INF/services/org.relaxng.datatype.DatatypeLibraryFactory META-INF/services/org.w3c.dom.DOMImplementationSourceList The first has always (more than a year been there when Chris added relaxng support, second was added a few weeks ago by Gary. Should these also not be there? The rule being if it is a service in the core classes we default to in in code not through service files? Then what about the prefs and sound ones? Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
