Hello Pekka, El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org> escribió:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez > <guille.rodrig...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I think that asking to "help rather than complain" is a bit unfair. > > No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying Andrew is > doing a crappy job as a maintainer No, I am definitely NOT saying that, nothing even close. Please don't put your words in my mouth, thank you. > in reality he's pretty much > the only one developing GNU Classpath these days... > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez > <guille.rodrig...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > First of all I am not "complaining", I am trying to suggest that perhaps, > > if time and resources are limited, the best way to spend them would be to > > look for a successor. > > Thanks for the suggestion. We're going to just ignore it because it > makes no sense. Ok :) Once you answer the hypothetical question *who* should > be the successor, you will understand why. I see, so if I don't have the answer, the question makes no sense. Ok. > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez > <guille.rodrig...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Second, I am willing to help in any way I can, and already stated that. > > Yes I can submit patches (and will do) although in my opinion this does > > not address the underlying problem. I think that updating the website > > (to help raise awareness and attract developers) would be much more > > useful than sending patches to fix bugs or issues. > > I also think the website needs fixing. Are sources to it available > somewhere and who is able to update it if someone actually sends a > patch against it? That's what I asked as well. Guillermo -- Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia guille.rodrig...@gmail.com
