El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org>
escribió:

> El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org
> <javascript:;>> escribió:
> >> No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying Andrew is
> >> doing a crappy job as a maintainer
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
> <guille.rodrig...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > No, I am definitely NOT saying that, nothing even close. Please don't put
> > your words in my mouth, thank you.
>
> Of course you are saying that.


No, I am not.


> Why else would you even bring up the
> issue of finding a "competent successor" which implies that Andrew is
> no longer interested in GNU Classpath and neglecting its maintenance?


Wrong. I said that if the current maintainers don't have time or resources,
perhaps they could look for a competent successor. One that they trust.
That does not imply that the current maintainers are not competent. That
might have been your interpretation, but it is not what I think and it is
not what I said.

(By the way, when I said "competent successor" I was just quoting Eric S
Raymond, literally. I even linked to the source.)


> El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org
> <javascript:;>> escribió:
> >> Once you answer the hypothetical question *who* should
> >> be the successor, you will understand why.
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
> <guille.rodrig...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > I see, so if I don't have the answer, the question makes no sense. Ok.
>
> You didn't even try to answer the question, did you?


No. I don't have the answer, and I don't think that having an answer is a
prerequisite for a question to be valid.


>
> If Andrew actually needed a "competent successor" (he doesn't),


If he doesn't, then all the better. I am not trying to annoy anyone, just
trying to help.

At least this ignited a discussion. That's already something.

Guillermo


-- 
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
guille.rodrig...@gmail.com

Reply via email to