Peter Memishian writes: > > Actually, since we have a socket per DHCP lif and state machine > > instance, I was suggesting making it so that the conn_t could have at > > most exactly one ill_t in its set, not multiple. Yes, that'd nail > > dhcpagent down so that we could never use the single-socket approach. > > Well, at least until someone comes up with an improved SIOCSLIFDHCPINIT > ;-) I think I can make this work; I'll give it a shot shortly and send > out a new webrev.
OK. I'm not thrilled with this answer myself, but at least it's somewhat more likely to be "safe." -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
