David Edmondson wrote:
> I can imagine that specific example being useful when using some kind of
> scripted zone creation.
My imagination isn't that good. I still don't understand the your use
case :-(
> How different is that example from saying that both zoneA and zoneB
> should be able to create links with the name "foo0"?
That is an argument for it potentially being easy to implement, and not
about a use case.
> If the links assigned to the non-global zones exist in a separate part
> of the namespace, then having each of them see 'net0' should be
> possible, with the presumption that the global zone would rename the
> link after assigning it to the non-global zone.
Ditto.
Sorry for being dense, but I'd like to understand the problem you think
we need to solve before discussing a solution.
Erik
