On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:34:11PM +0800, Cathy Zhou wrote: > I agree this needs some thought but I think the problem needs to be solved > with a big virtualization picture and I am not sure this has to be solved > now. I'd prefer defering this kind of complicated decisions to a later > project, and we will only support per-zone iptun names (created by ifconfig > ip.tun0 plumb). The only difference user will see from today is that one > can create an iptun in a global zone and assign it to an exclusive zone.
Somewhat reluctantly, okay. Reluctantly because there is a change to the model happening here yet it's not carried through. Okay because of the fact that it will affect only IP tunnels, which aren't real layer 2 devices anyway (and the fact that requiring a full solution suggests that I should offer some time, which I don't have). dme.
