> Yes. That is a problem. > > But I am thinking of this problem for a while: currently we proppse to make > the datalink configuration API (the APIs to manage and persist datalink > configuration) to be part of libdladm. Then all other libraries will have to > depend on libdladm. But at the same time, as it is currently true, libdladm > depends on other libraries too. > > I think we have to introduce another library to hold all the common > functions.
Or use a registration mechanism and function pointers. -- meem
