Peter Memishian wrote:
> OK. Another design we should seriously consider is merging liblaadm,
> libwladm and libdladm into a single library. If there is no longer a
> clear boundary between the layers (which seems to be the case if things
> frequently need to call into one another), then merging into a common
> library may be the simplest approach. Alternatively, it may make sense to
> merge just certain parts -- e.g., APIs that deal with persistent
> configuration (since we now have a single persistent configuration).
Just wondering, what is the original design rationale those
link layer manipulation libraries should be separated?
--
K. Poon.
kacheong.poon at sun.com
