On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:41 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > [1] This would depend on the individual DLPI primitive. Here's a > > proposed breakdown: > > > > DL_INFO_REQ [none] > > DL_BIND_REQ net_rawaccess > > DL_UNBIND_REQ net_rawaccess > > DL_UDQOS_REQ net_rawaccess > > DL_ATTACH_REQ net_rawaccess > > DL_DETACH_REQ net_rawaccess > > > > Those two won't work with net_rawaccess. (Or, more precisely, they > offer no benefit -- at least for style 2 streams -- if they require > this. Because you have to attach before you can do much meaningful with > DL_PHYS_ADDR_REQ or DL_INFO_REQ.)
You're right, DL_ATTACH_REQ shouldn't require privileges. That's sort of moot, however, since everything GLDv3 is style-1 anyway. You don't need to attach. -Seb
