On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:43 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Sebastien Roy wrote:
> > I'll include you in the code-review if you'd like to get a close look at
> > the implementation.  Basically, dld does these checks centrally in one
> > place based on a "description" of the ioctls that modules pass in to dld
> > using a registration mechanism.  Part of this "description" includes
> > whether a given ioctl requires the sys_dl_config privilege.
> >   
> 
> "It happens in the dld kernel module" is sufficiently detailed for my 
> concern.  Them main thing is that the checks in dladm itself are going away.

That's right.

> > What protections are you referring to exactly?  Yes, the VNIC file
> > permissions will no longer apply since there will no longer be a VNIC
> > control device node.  There will only be a single /dev/dld.
> > Perhaps /dev/dld should be mentioned in the fast-track, even though it's
> > really an implementation detail.
> >   
> 
> As a postscript, its not a bad note to have.  The point of concern here 
> is that the other (various) access control methods are being removed, in 
> favor of a single check in dld.  Right?

That's exactly right.

Thanks,
-Seb



Reply via email to